If I could catch the ducks, I’d stop them nibbling me to death (#SFWApro)

I am once again falling behind on my non-writing to-do list.

This includes a variety of odds and ends I do around the house (clean, water plants, keep the bird feeder filled); arranging for contractors to fix things and assorted paperwork (reapplying for my pension from my previous employer). I’m doing fine with the stuff that has to be done, such as watering plants or arranging dog medical appointments but not so much the rest of it.

Normally my solution is to do a little thing each day, on morning tea break for example. Then that didn’t seem to be working for me, so I tried catching up on things in one big clump on the weekends. Only I found devoting a large chunk of time to that stuff unsatisfying.

So I thought hmm, maybe I just need a schedule adjustment: I’ll use my morning break to read, then do my task of the day in the evening (unless it involves calling people to make appointments, etc.) in part of my reading time.

Unfortunately it hasn’t worked well so far. Monday I had to work late in the evening to ensure I finished this week’s Screen Rant. And if TYG gets home late, it’s harder to deal with paperwork while I’m still minding the dogs. So presto, I’m already behind my new schedule.

I’ll find a way to catch up eventually, but right now it’s very frustrating as crap remains uncompleted.

Cover by Al Plastino, all rights remain with current holder.


Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Time management and goals

Becoming un-Moored (ROFL)

So Monday I mentioned the women who claim lying theocrat Roy Moore hit on them when they were underage, and that some Republicans were defending him (better a pedophile for senator than a Democrat, and no I’m not kidding). Since then the ground has shifted so rapidly it’s worth some more links:

The American Family Association and other religious conservatives still support Moore. AFA official Sandy Rios brushed off the charges on the grounds there isn’t a man who “doesn’t have something in his past, in his box of secrets, that he’s ashamed of sexually?” Particularly since the 1960s when all that evil free love started subverting godly behavior (we’ll just ignore that for some Christians the age difference is very godly). Of course this kind of open-mindedness never applied when Bill Clinton cheated, even though he acknowledged his sin and asked for forgiveness — precisely what Christians are supposed to do. Somehow sins can only be washed away for Republicans like Moore and Newt Gingrich.

Likewise, Fox News Jeanine Pirro has done a complete 180 on whether old sex-crime charges are important: she used to think so but in Moore’s case hey, it was 30 years ago, forget about it okay?

Several Alabama churches that supposedly came out in support of Moore say he’s lying about that (their endorsements predated the current scandal). Others stand firm.

And the charges keep coming. That Moore was banned from a local mall for chasing teenage girls. A woman says she was 16 when Moore tried to rape her. Moore makes the claim he never dated any young girls without their mothers’ permission, which for some conservative Christians probably sounds reasonable.

Some conservative pundits (though not all) are declaring Moore damaged goods. Ross Douthat has condemned him and discussed how male-dominated churches must hold men accountable — though as Echidne points out, that’s not practical. I suspect Roy Edroso is right: it’s one thing for a right-wing Christian polemicist like Rios to stand by Moore, but an NYT columnist like Douthat has to look good to the mainstream audience. In the current debate over harassment and predation, that makes supporting someone like Moore a career risk.

One writer at the ever-vapid Federalist is worried enough about the big picture to resort to the old stand-by: Moore isn’t a conservative. Moore ignored higher court decisions (ordering judges not to issue marriage licenses to gays, even after the Obergefell decision, for instance) which violates the law and no conservative would do that. Of course the same writer (as noted at the link) had no problem with that in an earlier article, describing Moore’s defiance of the law as proving him an “anti-establishment conservative,” the kind we need more of in Congress!

More generally, lots of conservatives support Moore’s actions and those by other anti-gay officials. Large numbers of religious conservatives have embraced him as their champion. Would The Federalist claim all those people are anti-conservative? If not, just what makes more not one any more?

Will any of this make a difference to Alabama voters? Will they decide it’s all a conspiracy by the Washington Post? As a former Bible Belt resident, I suspect they’ll vote for the “godly” Moore (who apparently retro-opposes the civil rights movement) — what does a little assault matter compared to fighting against the Homosexual Agenda? That’s why Rios claims an attack on Moore is an attack on Christianity.

But I have slightly more hope than Monday that I’m wrong. And being wrong would be good. While I’ve heard arguments Moore in the Senate would just make Republicans look worse, I think the risk of legitimizing or normalizing his extreme views is much worse. Better he stay out of DC.

Fingers crossed.


Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Is Our Writer’s Learning? Merlin’s Ring (#SFWApro)

Once again, none of the books I’ve read recently with an eye to Is Our Writer’s Learning worked for one reason or another. So once again I’m bending the rules to include an older book, H. Warner’s Munn’s 1970s fantasy Merlin’s Ring, with that striking cover by Gervasio Gallardo (all rights remain with current holder). If you think it jumbles a lot of elements together, well there’s a reason for that. Incidentally this is the last of the Ballantine Adult Fantasy books I’ve been reading over the last few years.

The story: This sequel to Merlin’s Godson has the eponymous Gwalchmai thawed out of the suspended animation by his Atlantean lover, Corenice (he’s immortal from an elixir, she’s immortal by being a disembodied spirit). They face the dual challenges of a)being together even though she can only take physical form by possessing other bodies and b)fulfilling Gwalchmai’s mission to tell Rome, or some suitable Christian monarch, of the existence of North America so they can colonize it. On top of which, Merlin’s spirit keeps adding other missions, such as delivering Excalibur to Arthur’s crypt for the day the king reawakens. The quests take Gwalchmai and Corenice from Iceland to Stonehenge to Faerie, east to China and Japan, then back to France to ally with Joan of Arc.


What’s unquestioned in one era looks real bad in another. Just as Merlin’s Godson suffered from the white savior trope, here we have an unquestioned embrace of colonialism. Even after learning that Rome has fallen to barbarians, the possibility of not encouraging Europe to colonize America never occurs to Gwalchmai (or, presumably Munn). In one part of the novel, Gwalchmai is involved in China’s plans to invade Japan. He comes to realize that the invasion is wrong and switches sides. There’s never a similar consideration regarding North America. Even when this came out, there was enough criticism of Columbus, it wouldn’t have been that radical to consider it.

On the other hand, I do like the couple’s repeated decisions to send various oppressed people (pacifist monks, Welsh refugees) west to find refuge beyond the reach of their enemies. Yes, it’s still colonialism, but the escape-from-oppression aspect makes it palatable at least to me.

Details are cool, even if not everyone gets them. One of the things I’ve noticed writing historical fantasy is that some details, even if I enjoy including them, probably won’t mean anything to someone who hasn’t read as much history. But if they’re good details, I think they’re worth including anyway. Apparently Munn does too as he throws in a lot of them. Most notably (for me) he has a reference to Prince Madoc, the Welsh nobleman who supposedly founded a colony on the Gulf of Mexico (this was a key point in Excalibur). I’m guessing most readers won’t guess this element has any basis in quasi-history, but it doesn’t hurt the book and it adds something for anyone who spots it.

Orson Scott Card was right. I’ve mentioned several times before that I’m a fan of Orson Scott Card’s story-types approach: Whether you start your story as a mystery, a character study, a thriller, etc., that’s how it should end. Merlin’s Ring is a good example.

This novel sprawls all over the map. It spans 600 years, multiple location and follows lots of side alleys: Joan’s fight against England, the fate of Roland’s sword, a quest for Prester John. At times it spirals out of control — I could probably have done with less of Joan, for instance. But what keeps it coherent is that the heart of the book is Gwalchmai/Corenice. The book opens with her reviving him and ends with them united in spirit forever. In between, their love is what keeps the story going, no matter where the plot leads us. It’s probably the strongest core Munn could have chosen.

We’ll see if next month I can find something more recent.


Leave a comment

Filed under Is Our Writers Learning?, Reading

Wonder Woman: So nice, she reboots twice! (#SFWApro)

In my last Wonder Woman post I predicted it would be a while before my next rereading post. But the issues launching the next soft reboot parallel the Greg Rucka/Liam Sharp Rebirth TPB The Truth so I figured I’d combine them in one post.

After exposing Morgan Tracy as the Master Planner, Gerry Conway’s follow-up issue (cover by Ross Andru and Dick Giordano, all rights remain with current holder) has Diana trying to get back to normal. However the unceasing violence of Man’s World is getting to her, as is the police inability to lock up bad people (because Miranda rights! Fourth amendments! Obviously guilty criminals getting off!). And learning Tracy arranged Steve’s death just rubs that wound raw. So Diana returns to Paradise Island, thinking maybe she’ll stay for good. Hippolyta decides the best way to make her daughter happy is to erase her memories of Steve (not the first time she’s mucked with Diana’s memories).

Everything is fine, but after a couple of issues dealing with extradimensional intelligences mistakenly thinking the Amazons are a threat, a plane crashes on Paradise Island. The pilot? Steve Trevor.

Diana doesn’t remember him, though she’s conscious she feels astonishingly attracted to him almost at once. A bewildered Hippolyta goes to ask Aphrodite who explains that this Steve Trevor is a parallel world version whose plane crashed through the dimensional barriers into our world (and there’s no way to figure out where his home Earth is). Aphrodite concludes that destiny is clearly a Diana/Steve ‘shipper, so there’s no point in fighting it. Instead, she magically erases the world’s memory of Steve Trevor’s death so that this Steve can take up his counterpart’s life unawares. Once again the Amazons hold a tournament to decide who will accompany Steve back to Man’s World; while reluctant to leave, Diana is obligated to compete and finally accepts she can’t let her fears hold her back. She and Steve head off to the US together.

This, of course, is close to Robert Kanigher’s late-Silver Age reboot, but that suffered from lack of clarity — was it a complete reboot? Set back in the 1940s? Or what? Here readers know exactly why the book is redoing the origin. In the same retro spirit, Diana would go on to become a military intelligence officer alongside Steve in subsequent issues—I haven’t read ’em yet but I remember them. Apparently it was a successful move as this reboot lasted close to sixty issues — nothing since they dropped that set-up has done that well.

I only wish The Truth had been as good a reboot. Capping off Rucka’s first two volumes, this finishes retconning the New 52 Wonder Woman away.




It turns out that Ares is imprisoned on Themiscyra to prevent him destroying the world with war madness; the Amazons are there to guard him. If Diana ever returned home, that would give a road map to Ares’ sons Deimos and Phobos, who could then free him and drown the world in blood. To prevent that, all her trips back to the island have been imaginary (presumably so have all her New 52 Olympian adventures). Now that she knows she’s exiled from Themiscyra forever, she starts over with Steve, and the story ends with them exhausted in bed after making love.

As I said after reading Rucka’s first two TPBs, I really like his handling of Diana, I just don’t like the story he’s telling. This could have been wrapped up in two or three issues instead of seven — did we really need the two issues were Diana was locked up in an asylum believing her mind has snapped? And wouldn’t it just have been easier for the Amazons to tell Di she could never return home than play these games? I know, that’s par for the course in retcons and reboots, but much as I disliked the New 52 WW, this didn’t work for me. And unlike Conway’s, it doesn’t look like this is leading anywhere good: the current arc is focused on the Twin Brother We Never Knew Diana Had and Grail, Darkseid’s Amazon daughter. As they were both introduced by Geoff Johns in his Darkseid War arc in Justice League, I wonder if the current writer picked them or Johns’ standing at DC means they must be treated as the next big thing. I imagine I’ll find out when the library gets the TPBs.

Leave a comment

Filed under Wonder Woman

Conservative nostalgia is a dangerous delusion

So Kevin Sorbo’s wife Sam Sorbo has an editorial on Fox News (not linking to it) recycling the time-honored conservative/religious right about how America has lost its moral compass: “American society used to be governed by Judeo-Christian do-unto-others morals. But we have drifted (been pushed, really) into a hedonistic YOLO (You Only Live Once) cultural morass. The upshot of this is a distinct lack of respect for human life in general, as well as a pervasive, insidious obsession with self.” And go figure, her primary examples are not billionaires demanding the biggest tax cuts but Clinton supposedly selling U.S. uranium to Russia and football players protesting police-on-black violence.

Fantasies of some golden age when everyone was moral, kids respected their elders and we could leave our doors unlocked probably go back as long as we’ve had doors. The trouble is, Sorbo, like a lot of religious conservatives, wants us to believe it’s true (and may believe it herself). It’s not. “Judeo-Christian do-unto-others morals” (I always interpret “Judeo-Christian” as “Christian but we don’t want to sound bigoted”) didn’t do anything to stop the hundreds of blacks lynched in the South under Jim Crow — white evangelical churches were strongly against integration and civil rights (that was Jerry Falwell’s big political issue for years). Conservative Christianity was on the wrong side of the women’s rights movement, then on the gay rights movement. Some members are against any religion but their own having First Amendment rights. The idea that we’re in some moral cesspool because we don’t follow Ms. Sorbo’s view of God is just crapola.

Case in point, Bible-thumping theocrat Roy Moore has now been accused of hitting on and getting physical (though not actual presentation) with girls as young as 14 (oh, here are his past views on rape and child abuse). I will be astonished if it makes a difference because a lot of voters in the Bible Belt define “Christian” as anti-gay, anti-Muslim, anti-liberal, and Moore fits the bill nicely. One voter has declared it’s better to vote for a pedophile than a Democrat because he hates Democrats and thinks they’re evil (a view he apparently does not hold of pedophiles).

Sean Hannity’s interview with Moore apparently left some pundits convinced he’s guilty.  But it’s unlikely any Republican pols will do anything to oppose Moore but wring their hands.

I blogged a while back about allegations Eddie Berganza at DC Comics was a sexual harasser. Buzzfeed presents the words of several women who say yes, he was.

Putin says Russia didn’t meddle in the 2016 election. Trump is very, very upset that people don’t believe him — it might hurt Putin’s feelings.

Trump might not build a border wall or repeal Obamacare, but he’s sure as hell getting right-wing judges appointed to the bench.

Trump thinks a primary argument for passing Republican tax cuts is that he’ll pay a lot without them.

Apparently the UK finds Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity violate broadcast standards for news shows.

A member of the sexist Proud Boys movement thinks trans candidates only won because women have the vote and women vote based on feelings. In contrast, presumably to his loathing for transsexuals which I’m sure he imagines is totally logical.

1 Comment

Filed under economics, Politics, Undead sexist cliches

Psychics, feminists, maps and guns: books read (#SFWApro)

WHISPERS OF WARNING is the second in Jesse Estevao’s Change of Fortune series about quasi-phony psychic Ruby who uses her powers to work as a medium at her aunt’s spiritualist hotel. In this volume a prominent suffragette and medium’s (almost certainly based on feminist firebrand Victoria Woodhull) arrival in town brings lots of attention, some of it fatal, forcing Ruby to figure out Whodunnit after the cops write it off as a suicide. This was pleasant to read, though nowhere near as gripping as the first book — but then I’m not a fan of cozy series (so if you are, you might like it better).

BAD FEMINIST: Essays by Roxanne Gay is only partly about feminism (not enough to be useful research for Undead Sexist Cliches), as the essays are a scattershot collection ranging from competitive Scrabble to movies about slavery (she’s tired of ’em) to trigger warnings and rape jokes (not a fan of either), weight issues and why she prefers UPN’s old show Girlfriends to BET’s programming. Some good reading, but more that didn’t grab me.

A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN 12 MAPS by Jerry Broton looks at how maps in different eras have met the needs of a variety of different uses and communities — national myth building, scientific interest in the world, geopolitical threats (such as the Mackinder “world axis” map showing Russia as the pivot on which the world turns), business and trade, religious belief and the as yet unknown impact of Google Earth. I found Drawing the Line more readable, partly because Broton tells me more than I want to know (which isn’t his fault) and partly because he fills a lot of pages with extraneous information (which is) — I don’t see any reason the Google Earth chapter needed a history of computers and the Internet. Worth skimming, but not detailed reading for me.

STAND YOUR GROUND: A History of America’s Love Affair With Lethal Self-Defense by Caroline E. Light looks at how America in the 1800s rejected the time-honored British rule that if it’s possible to retreat from a confrontation, that’s preferable to using lethal force. In early America this was seen as unworthy of proud, independent men, so case law developed the right to shoot your way out, even if you have an alternative, and subsequent cases (not to mention the politicized NRA) only reaffirmed that. Unfortunately, this standard was heavily shaped by slavery and patriarchy — what was acceptable for Real Men was unacceptable for blacks and women, so that it becomes less about defense and more about preserving white male superiority (in one South Carolina case the prosecutor argued “stand your ground” laws only apply to fighting off strangers, not a woman fighting against her abusive husband). This stuff is interesting but Light spends much of the book on the history of race and gender relations to provide context, and most of that I already knew. So not as rewarding as I’d hoped.

Not a great week of reading, but here’s a picture of Trixie chewing on a toy to make up for it. Credit me please if you use.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reading

From the stone age to the age of Peanuts: graphic novels (#SFWApro)

As I’ve accumulated a lot of these to review, I’ll just skip Saturday’s movie reviews this week so I can catch up.

FLINTSTONES: Bedrock Bedlam by Mark Russell and Steve Pugh (cover by Pugh, all rights to current holder) is the second and final volume in DC’s reboot of the old Hanna-Barbera series. The underlying premise is that humanity has just gone from hunter-gatherer to “modern” civilization in the space of a generation, so everyone’s still awkward in dealing with it. While it doesn’t really have the spirit of the old series (Fred and Barney are a lot smarter, and happily a lot less sexist), it wasn’t bad, particularly involving the interactions among the Flintstones’ living-creature appliances.

NIGHTWING: Nightwing Must Die by Tim Seeley and multiple artists is a real disappointment after the previous volume. Dick’s interactions with Damian Wayne are great, but this ignores most of what Back to Bludhaven set in motion to focus on the unmemorable Bat-foes Pyg and Hurt. Who, unfortunately spend lots and lots of time pontificating on What Makes a Hero — as I’ve said before, villains sharing Deep Thoughts (which are rarely actually deep) never works for me.

BATGIRL AND THE BIRDS OF PREY: Who Is Oracle? by Julie and Shawna Benson and Claire Roe is noteworthy for establishing yes, Babs Gordon did spend time as super-hacker Oracle in the New 52 continuity (something that was left vague up till now); this has her reunite the Birds of Prey when it turns out a new hacker has adopted Oracle’s ID. Unfortunately the book overall is middling at best, with unsatisfying art (everyone looks rather doughy, and I don’t think it’s because they’re bending body-standard norms or anything like that) and the dialog is way too TV-bantery.

Supergirl’s Rebirth volume 1, SUPERGIRL: Reign of the Cyborg Supermen by Steve Orlando and Brian Ching falls way below middling. I actually thought the previous Supergirl TPB, Crucible, had a good set-up but this ditches that for a remake that borrows as much as possible from the TV show without making it work (as a high-school student Kara is an Outcast Who Doesn’t Fit In! Wow, talk about originality!). On top of which we get one of the hoariest plotlines in the Super-mythos, Krypton attacks Earth (Supergirl’s already done that one recently). Given the New 52 was Kara’s third or fourth version in the 21st century, I wish they’d kept it instead of rebooting yet again.

JUSTICE LEAGUE: Darkseid War Part 2 by Geoff Johns and several artists only confirms that Johns has absolutely no sense of Kirby’s New Gods. In Origins, Darkseid’s a generic alien conqueror; Apokolips itself is equally mundane in Darkseid War Part One. In this TPB, which wrapped up Johns’ JLA run, the Anti-Monitor from Crisis on Infinite Earths is equally unimpressive, possessed by Kirby’s anti-life equation which turns him into a generic genocidal psycho (that the Anti-Life Equation is more about control and order than death and destruction flies over Johns’ head). I’d welcome the Justice League’s Rebirth run if that were any good.

Switching from the Super-stuff, BECOMING UNBECOMING by Una is a mix of the author’s ruminations on sexual violence (I doubt anything in the current crop of exposures would surprise her) with the account of the Yorkshire Ripper who terrified her community when she was growing up, partly because of the epic police fail in dealing with him. Didn’t entirely work for me because a lot of the sexual assault information was old news to me — a personal memoir mixed in with the Ripper stuff would have worked better.

THE COMPLETE PEANUTS: 1965-66 shows Charles Schulz in peak form — even though I’ve read all of these dozens of time, I found myself laughing a lot. And Schulz is still willing to try new stuff, as Snoopy enters his Sopwith Camel for the first time and some girl named “Peppermint” Patty volunteers to coach “Chuck” Brown’s team. Very good, though as I’ve noticed before, even Peanuts isn’t as timeless as some people think (there’s a joke about Hathaway shirts that will baffle lots of people now).



Filed under Comics