Archenemies: the need for a nemesis (#SFWApro)

Blogging about the Archie Comics version of The Shadow got me thinking about how heroes having a nemesis seems much more important today than it used to be.

As Section 244 noted in review that Shadow, Shiwan Khan was the Shadow’s arch-enemy in the pulps … but that only amounted to four out of more than 300 pulps. Archie used him in seven out of eight issues. DC’s The Shadow Strikes made him the main adversary of the run, and emphasized that he and the Shadow came from the same school of mystic secrets (as did the Alec Baldwin The Shadow film).

6371220

Doc Savage faced John Sunlight only twice, but almost every comics adaptation since has used him. He even turns up in Roger Zelazny’s Roadways, though without formally acknowledging who it is (cover by James Bama, all rights to current holder)

The Stygian sorcerer Thoth-Amon appears in the background of the first Conan story, The Phoenix on the Sword, and plays an even more shadowy role in The God in the Bowl. He never met Conan, never targeted Conan, but in the Lancer series of Conan novels, he was elevated to mortal enemy. And he’s played a correspondingly large role in the Cimmerians’ comics adaptations. Likewise Thulsa Doom, who appeared in one of Robert E. Howard’s King Kull stories, became a running foe in later versions.

Heck, even Professor Moriarty only appears in two Sherlock Holmes stories (The Final Problem, Valley of Fear). He (or variant versions of him, for example in the Cumberpatch Sherlock), play a much bigger role in later writers’ hands — the early 20th century Arthur Wontner film series, for example (one of the first Definitive Holmes) used him in multiple movies.

Part of this, of course, is the same reason we enjoy continuations of series (James Bond, Sherlock Holmes) long after the creator has passed on. If a character’s good, we want to see more of them.

But I also wonder if this isn’t some sort of cultural shift, though I’m not sure what or why. After all, it’s now routine for TV cop shows to give homicide detectives a nemesis in the form of some particularly nasty killer. In addition to the ones at the link, the CW’s TV series of Frequency turns the Nightingale Killer into the same sort of arch-foe.

So does this indicate anything significant? And if so what? Or am I just following the human tradition of seeing patterns that don’t exist?

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Movies, Reading, TV, Writing

3 responses to “Archenemies: the need for a nemesis (#SFWApro)

  1. I think that there’s a sentiment, among writers at least, that a hero is measured by the stature of the villains they overcome. Batman facing a series of common criminals wouldn’t be the same – having the Joker as a nemesis elevates them both.

  2. There’s truth to that. And partly it may be that so many more stories come out now–starting in the late sixties the amount of Conan material became way more than Howard ever wrote. So perhaps it’s easier than creating multiple formidable villains, which Howard certainly managed.

  3. Pingback: Enter Moriarty, Exit Holmes: The Final Problem (#SFWApro) | Fraser Sherman's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s